ZorchLandia!
Fido versus...
ZorchLandia!
Who is Zorch Frezberg? Well, whoever he is, seems whenever he goes into his "rapid fire"
questions mode, no one seems to forget that there was one little question he
never answered. You might say that he's being "shot down" by everyone. His credibility?
Zilch! Here are some of the finest we've seen lately.
Area : z1c
Date : Mon Jun 29, 12:01
From : Doc Logger 1:163/110
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : questions for you to dodge
=======================================
I see that you are having fun trying to avoid the obvious with respect to the
actions of the RECC. Naturally, it doesn't seem to register with you that the
RECs *did* consult with their regions before voting to censure Kohl. You make
much of the fact that Kohl wasn't invited to the new listserve conference.
Here's a question: How many RECs did Kohl threaten with expulsion from the RECC
echo for "revealing" the topics of discussion to their respective regions?
Since I'm not fond of leaving hanging questions, I'll give you an answer: All of
them. The reason that the little troll wasn't invited to the listserve
conference was because he was trying to be such a fascist wanker in the existing
echo. The little prick thought he could order the RECs around and dictate the
degree of public input they sought from their sysops.
You asked why Kohl wasn't invited to participate in the discussion about his
censure. Umm, in this echo alone, Kohl was asked six times to appoint an REC for
Region 10. One of the reasons why he was censured is because he didn't appoint
an R10EC.
Here's another question: Is Kohl threatening Ruth Argust because she has told
the truth about Kohl's petty animosity towards her derived from her refusal to
board his horse?
Here's another question: Is Brenda Donovan stupid or just incredibly naive when
she asserts that Kohl's behaviour is no one's business but Region 10's? Do you
think she can grasp the concept of the appeal process entrenched in the RCC?
Second Last question: Who but the idiotic would believe that Kohl did not reveal
the contents of Hans Mangold's in transit netmail? Do you believe that Kohl did
not disclose the contents? If so, who revealed the contents of Mangold's private
netmail to you?
Last Question: Did you vote twice in the ZEC election?
--- Maximus 2.00
* Origin: Intnl Order of Commando Turtles & Literary Penguins (1:163/110)
Area : z1c
Date : Tue Jun 23, 13:09
From : Mike McGrane 1:282/1024
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : questions of the RECs
=======================================
Monday June 22 1998 17:36, Zorch Frezberg wrote to David Calafrancesco:
ZF> For all we know, the vote was made simply on the basis of personal
ZF> animosity, and not with any regard whatsoever to his ability to do the job
ZF> that he was (and please note this) ELECTED BY A ZONE-WIDE SYSOP LEVEL
ZF> VOTE.
Which may have been invalid you should know. You still have not answered the
question that has been asked numerous time. Did you or did you not vote once as
Zorch Frezberg and again and Mark Hernandez? Answer the question and do NOT
pussy foot the question. Now it is a vary simple Yes or No question, lets see
if you can answer it.
-Mike
mike.mcgrane@frostbit.com
---
* Origin: The Exchange BBS (612)537-0449 (1:282/1024)
Area : z1c
Date : Tue Jun 23, 20:36
From : Jerry Gause 1:3651/9
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : humourous Snooz editors
=======================================
Zorch wrote in a message to Jerry:
ZF> No, but thank you for stating the name of the person behind this
ZF> effort.
That would be *persons*. Me included. If you'd like, I'll be the ringleader.
JG>> And to be continually honest, I'll add that the majority would
JG>> have
JG>> rather had Kohl replaced than to even try to work with him.
ZF> Based on what reasons?
What a minute! You asked another question. You owe me an answer still.
JG>> Since your region was w/o the representation of an REC during
JG>> that
JG>> period, you were denied the opportunity to voice your concerns
JG>> at the
JG>> regional level.
ZF> The only reason we were denied representation is that you (as the
ZF> RECC) refused to inform or interact
ZF> with the acting R10EC.
Oh. So now he was the acting REC? He denied it back then.
ZF> In point of fact, you also failed to inform him of the charges.
Charges? This isn't a court of law. We don't feel we can work with him
for many reasons. That's all that you need to be concerned with.
BTW, you seem to be the only one who is.
ZF> BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION ABOVE...the interest of the RECC was to
ZF> _remove_ the ZEC rather than to
ZF> consider working with him.
Note above "the majority" doesn't mention the RECC.
BY MY OWN ADMISSION ABOVE...the interest of the NEC's of my region was to
remove the ZEC rather than to even consider working with him.
Good try.
ZF> That sure sounds fair and just.
So does removing a perfectly good NEC due to personal reasons.
ZF> I'm willing to bet you treat your dog with more justice than the
ZF> RECC demonstrated with the ZEC, who was
ZF> elected by a ZONE-WIDE SYSOP LEVEL ELECTION.
I'da whooped my dogs ass for half as much.
I don't care if Satti appointed him for life.
We refuse to work with him.
Later,
Jerry Gause /* Team OS/2 */
gpgause@pdn.net
--- Sqed/32 1.14/r15128
* Origin: The Tech Shop/2 Darlington,SC (803) 395-2165 (1:3651/9)
Area : z1c
Date : Wed Jun 24, 00:38
From : Lynn Gipson 1:120/111
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : humourous Snooz editors
=======================================
ZF> JG> And to be continually honest, I'll add that the majority would have
ZF> JG> rather had Kohl replaced than to even try to work with him.
ZF>Based on what reasons?
The same kind of reasons that Kohl gives to those NCs he's removed?
ZF> JG> Since your region was w/o the representation of an REC during that
ZF> JG> period, you were denied the opportunity to voice your concerns at the
ZF> JG> regional level.
ZF>The only reason we were denied representation is that you (as the RECC)
ZF>refused to inform or interact with the acting R10EC.
Has the -acting R10EC- ever "refused to inform or interact with any
of his NCs when he was wearing his RC hat?
ZF>In point of fact, you also failed to inform him of the charges.
Following by example is supposed to be a form of flattery.
Area : z1c
Date : Wed Jun 24, 04:53
From : Darryl Gregorash 1:140/0
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : humourous Snooz editors
=======================================
Replying to a message of Zorch Frezberg to Jerry Gause:
JG>> Now that I have answered one of your "questions", please answer
JG>> one of mine.
JG>> Did you vote twice in the ZEC election?
ZF> Too late. I am unable to respond to this question at this time.
Why? Have you forgotten how many times you voted?
--- FleetStreet 1.22 NR
* Origin: NC 1:140 Saskatchewan Canada (1:140/0)
Area : z1c
Date : Wed Jun 24, 12:43
From : Jerry Gause 1:3651/9.1
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : humourous Snooz editors
=======================================
Zorch Frezberg wrote in a message to Jerry Gause:
ZF>> If you wish to send me mail, please use the correct name.
JG> Which one?
ZF> The correct one. You *can* read a nodelist, right?
Not till my mommy gets home.
After she reads me the nodelist, I'm gonna get her to
change my nodelist name to Zorch_Isa_Emailweenie.
Will you address me as such?
Later,
Jerry Gause /* Team OS/2 */
gpgause@pdn.net
--- timEd/2-B10
* Origin: The Tech Shop/too!!??? (1:3651/9.1)
Area : z1c
Date : Tue Jun 23, 21:26
From : David Calafrancesco 1:2624/306
To : Zorch Frezberg
Subj : ZEC out
=======================================
* Forwarded from area 'Z1C'
Zorch Frezberg wrote in a message to Lynn Gipson:
ZF> And, to point out matters further, Jim Balcom has been
ZF> replaced by David Calafrancesco...
ZF> 1:2624/306 | D. Calafrancesco | VFOS | 33.6 |
ZF> $15yr.
ZF> How odd...one FTP Service operator is replaced by another.
ZF> What does it mean?
That you need to get a life and get out more often. If you were to ask around
you would find that the above is a suggested cost recovery amount. For full
disclosure to satisfy your insatiable curiosity into other people's business, I
just received a $20 bill from Robert Vaughn. My only VModem connection. Wow, I
wonder what I will use the $20 for... perhaps to pay 2/3ds of a month of
expenses for my own FTP link?
How many times did you vote in the ZEC election?
With the merest flick of my fingers I could place my wife and two kids names
into my other entries and make them all legitmate system operators of this
multi-node BBS system. They would then be entitled to vote in all sysop level
elections, just like you. I could even tell them what and who to vote for. Why
is it that nobody questions whether I voted twice when I have the ability to
have arranged that very thing, yet the appearance is that you voted twice and
you refuse to answer the simple, unloaded question.
You use innuendo and loaded terms in your "questions" and then get all bent when
we won't play your games yet at the same time are unable or unwilling to answer
simple straight forward questions.
In the latest ZEC election did you vote as both Zorch Frezberg as well as M
Hernandez? No evasions, no getting off on a technicality because I may have
spelled a name wrong, stop avoiding the question, answer yes or no.
Dave Calafrancesco, Team OS/2
dave@drakkar.mhv.net
... They got the library at Alexandria, they're not getting mine!
---
* Origin: Druid's Grove BBS - (914)/876-2237 (1:2624/306)
Return to FidoLose Home Page
You are visitor number -- #COUNT
Zorch is on the RUN!